Australia has imposed a fine of $610,500 on X, a platform formerly known as Twitter and owned by Elon Musk. However, whether Elon Musk’s company will comply with the fine remains uncertain amidst broader discussions about corporate behaviour and regulatory enforcement.
According to the e-safety commissioner, there are three primary drivers for companies to adjust their behaviour: reputation, regulation, and revenue. Dr. Belinda Barnet of Swinburne University suggests that Australia’s e-safety commissioner might not be a top priority for Elon Musk, indicating potential challenges in enforcing the fine.
X received the fine for failing to address concerns regarding its handling of child sexual abuse material, following a prolonged exchange with the e-safety commissioner’s office. Concerns arise over X’s ability or willingness to pay the fine, especially after Musk’s restructuring of the company and legal disputes over unpaid rent.
The possibility of non-compliance raises questions about the efficacy of the fine in prompting procedural improvements within X. Experts suggest that better legislation might be necessary to drive meaningful change in corporate behaviour.
Should X fail to pay the fine or provide the requested information, the e-safety commissioner could pursue civil penalties through the federal court, potentially resulting in daily fines of up to $782,000, backdated to February 2023.
While the fine represents a step in the right direction, its impact on X’s operations and behaviour remains uncertain. The broader conversation emphasizes the importance of regulatory frameworks, including reputation management, in influencing corporate conduct.
Experts suggest that multiple fines across jurisdictions might compel X to take action. However, stronger enforcement powers, such as those outlined in the EU’s Digital Services Act, could have a more significant impact on corporate behaviour.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of fines and regulatory measures hinges on robust enforcement mechanisms and meaningful penalties. While local regulators advocate for stronger enforcement powers and higher fines, the willingness of companies like X to comply remains a focal point in ongoing discussions about corporate responsibility and regulatory compliance.
Back
